August 2014, Vol 3, No 5
Ibrutinib Tops Ofatumumab as Second-Line Therapy for CLL
For the second-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), ibrutinib improved not only progression-free survival (PFS) but also overall survival (OS), the phase 3 RESONATE study showed.
In conjunction with the ASCO presentation, the study was published online in the New England Journal of Medicine.
â€śIbrutinib beat a standard comparator in CLL for the first time,â€ť said John C. Byrd, MD, of the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center in Columbus. â€śIf I were a patient with CLL, I would want this drug. In the relapsed and refractory setting after 1 prior therapy, there is no good reason not to give this drug outside of a few circumstances.â€ť
Ibrutinib is a first-in-class irreversible inhibitor of Brutonâ€™s tyrosine kinase, and the drug has been given breakthrough therapy designation by the FDA.
The RESONATE study randomized previously treated patients with CLL and small lymphocytic leukemia to oral ibrutinib or IV ofatumumab. The overall response rate was 42.6% for ibrutinib versus 4.1% for ofatumumab (P<.001). At a median follow-up of 9.4 months, 86% of patients on ibrutinib had durable responses and were continuing on treatment with minimal side effects.
â€śThis is remarkable, especially considering that standard CLL therapies typically produce a 35% to 40% response rate,â€ť Byrd commented.
Improvement in PFS and OS, and Well Tolerated
At 6 months, PFS rates were 83% in the ibrutinib arm versus 49% in the ofatumumab arm. Median PFS was not yet reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 8.1 months with ofatumumab (P<.0001), representing a 78% reduction in the risk of progression. The impact on PFS was observed in all patient groups, including the elderly and those with deletions in chromosome 17p, ie, the poor-prognosis subsets.
OS was significantly improved at 90% with ibrutinib versus 81% with ofatumuÂmab, representing a 57% reduction in risk of death (P<.0049). The improvement in survival remained significant despite the crossover of 57 patients who had progressed on ofatumumab.
Both regimens were fairly well tolerated, with similar rates of major hemorrhage and renal toxicities; rates of atrial fibrillation were higher with ibrutinib, while neuropathy was more common with ofatumumab. The risk of diarrhea often observed with ibrutinib was modest and manageable in most patients, he said.
Call to Embrace Ibrutinib
â€śThe findings of phase 2 and the confirmatory phase 3 study show ibrutinib should be used for all relapsed refractory CLL,â€ť Byrd maintained.
Gregory Masters, MD, of the Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Newark, DE, who moderated an ASCO press conference, seemed to agree. â€śIt is impressive to see an OS benefit in CLL.
…This drugâ€™s efficacy can potentially transform the treatment of CLL, replacing more toxic therapy,â€ť he said.
Ibrutinib will soon undergo phase 3 testing in mantle cell lymphoma with bendamustine/rituximab as the comparator. Ibrutinib is also in phase 3 study as first-line therapy for CLL.
The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer is not cost-effective,â€ť according to Daniel A. Goldstein, MD, of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, who led a cost-effectiveness analysis that earned an ASCO Merit Award at the annual meeting. The lack of cost-effectiveness was demonstrated at a willingness-to-pay threshold of [ Read More ]
Dear Colleague, Until recently, cancer treatment relied solely on histological diagnosis for determining systemic therapy. Aside from considerations related to a patientâ€™s underlying comorbidities and performance status, there was minimal deviation from an organ-of-originâ€“based treatment strategy. This relatively primitive understanding of malignancy failed to exploit biological and molecular differences within [ Read More ]